A NutriRECS-consortium systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of lower- vs higher-red/processed-meat diets on cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes, applying the GRADE framework to formally rate the certainty of the RCT evidence. Concludes the trial evidence for benefit from reducing red/processed meat is low-to-very-low certainty and the estimated effects are small, part of a guideline package recommending no change to current consumption. Minted here not as egg data (it contains none) but as the explicit “grade the evidence’s certainty, don’t just narrate it” way-of-knowing template the brief calls for, which could analogously be applied to the egg-cohort literature.
relevance_note: The explicit GRADE/NutriRECS methodology precedent the brief names as a template — a methodology artifact, not an egg-data primary.